Have you ever been tempted by a
short-term loan with no credit check “and you get to keep your
car”? Don't get sucked in by an illegal
auto title loan. Michigan is fighting back against them and you can
help!
Wednesday, January 27, 2016
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
Volkswagen Woos Customers, Refuses to Settle With EPA
Detroit is buzzing with the
excitement of the annual North American International Auto Show.
Volkswagen is wooing customers with concept cars and the newest
models. But behind the scenes, the company is still dodging
settlements to protect the very consumers they are chasing.
Wednesday, January 13, 2016
Takata Emails Show Blatant Data Manipulation
Takata, the
company that made airbags for Honda and other auto manufacturers, was
in hot water throughout 2015 as regulators and legislators held them
under the microscope for airbag defects. Now a private lawsuit has
revealed emails showing the company engaged in blatant data
manipulation about the safety of their products.
In 2015, Takata
faced legislative hearings, regulatory investigations, and ultimately
fines because airbags it made explode, sending shrapnel into the
passenger cabin. Takata airbag defects have killed 8 people and
injured hundreds more.
All of this
culminated in November 2015 when Honda fired Takata and the National
Highway Traffic Safety Association (NHTSA) imposed a $70 million
penalty on the company. Both entities listed data manipulation as a
reason for their behavior.
But evidence of
Takata's manipulation of mandatory safety data had never been public
before. That is, until a Florida woman sued the company for a 2014
accident. The aggressive deployment of the Takata airbag left her
paralyzed. In investigating her private lawsuit, the plaintiff's
lawyers discovered emails that showed how deeply data manipulation
was ingrained in Takata's corporate policy. Those emails were
unsealed and shared with the
New York Times, who hired experts to review them.
Back in 2005
Takata airbag engineer Bob Schubert had reported in an internal memo
that he had been “repeatedly exposed to the Japanese practice of
altering data presented to the customer,” which the business
called “the way we do business in Japan.”
But one year
later, Schubert was encouraging fellow employees to engage in data
manipulation himself, saying “Happy Manipulating!!!” The
Times reported:
“Hey, I manipulated,” Mr.
Schubert responded. The objective, he said, was to help disguise that
some of the inflaters performed differently from the rest — a
dynamic referred to as “bimodal distribution.”
“I showed all the data together, which helped disguise the
bimodal distribution,” Mr. Schubert wrote. “Nothing wrong with
that. All the data is there. Every piece,” he added. But then he
suggested using “thick and thin lines to try and dress it up, or
changing colors to divert attention.”
But Linda Rink, a
former senior staff scientist for airbag manufacturer Autoliv,
disagreed that nothing was wrong with manipulating data to hide
problems with performance:
“If they would
disguise inflater data sent to the customer, there is a serious
problem with ethics within that company,” she said. “Having a
bimodal distribution requires an explanation and a root-cause
analysis, not a cover-up.”
If the
plaintiff's attorney in Florida can show Takata knew about the
dangers of their airbags, it could open the door for more lawsuits.
Motorists hurt in Hondas and other vehicles equipped with the Takata
airbags could find the way cleared to be compensated for their
injuries.
Dani K.
Liblang is an attorney for The Liblang Law Firm, P.C. She defends the
victims of defective
vehicle crashes against auto manufactures who dodge safety
requirements. If you or someone you know has been hurt by a defective
vehicle, contact
The Liblang Law Firm, P.C., today for a free consultation.
Wednesday, January 6, 2016
What to Do if You Got a Lemon Car for Christmas
Getting a new car for Christmas
should be about a big bow and a sleek new ride. But for some new car
owners, the new year brings new problems. Find out what you should do
if you got a lemon car for Christmas.
What is a Lemon Car?
Just because you don't like your new car doesn't mean it counts as a lemon. Instead, a lemon is a passenger car or truck that continues to have the same defect that negatively impacts the value of the vehicle. It's not enough for your car to need repairs after you buy it. But if repeated efforts to fix the automobile keep falling short, you may be driving a lemon.Repairing a Lemon
Before your troubled vehicle becomes a lemon you have to give the manufacturer or dealership a “reasonable number of repair attempts.” Under Michigan law, this means:- You've brought the car in for the same repair 4 or more times
in 2 years; or
- Your car is out of commission for at least 30 days of your
first year for one or more problems.
Notifying the Manufacturer
If your vehicle is headed toward being categorized as a lemon, you need to notify the manufacturer about the need for repair by certified mail, return receipt requested either after the third repair or after the vehicle has been in the shop for 25 days. Talk to a Michigan Lemon Law Lawyer, like Dani K. Liblang before you send it in, to make sure your notice satisfies Michigan law.Opportunity to Repair or Replace
The manufacturer gets one last chance to fix your car after you send in the notice. If it can't do so within 5 days, your car is a lemon and you are entitled to a replacement or a refund.Returning Your Christmas Lemon
If the manufacturer can't fix your car it must give you two options:- Replace the vehicle. You have the authority to accept
or reject the replacement.
- Refund the cost of the vehicle. You are entitled to
the full purchase price of the vehicle, minus an amount representing
your use of the vehicle.
Heading to Court
Manufacturers will often fight the process of returning a lemon car. If your manufacturer or dealership won't work with you, you may need to attend arbitration or even file a lawsuit to get the relief you deserve according to Michigan law.Don't let your biggest Christmas gift leave a sour taste in your mouth. If repeated repairs are getting in the way of enjoying your new car, contact Lemon Law Lawyer Dani K. Liblang. She will walk you through the process and make sure you get what you deserve under the law.
Wednesday, December 30, 2015
Fiat Chrysler Takes Another Hit for Safety Reporting Failures
The National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration isn't pulling its punches when it comes to safety
reporting failures. Earlier this month, the agency hit Fiat Chrysler
with its second multi-million dollar fine. The hope is the fines will
make the industry more proactive when it comes to consumer safety.
Wednesday, December 23, 2015
Supreme Court Fails Consumers, Upholds Arbitration Clauses
Arbitration
clauses are how big businesses escape class action lawsuits that hold
them accountable to their customers. Despite ongoing efforts to ban
mandatory arbitration clauses and class-arbitration waivers, this
month the Supreme Court came out strongly in favor of the practice,
upholding a coercive mandatory arbitration provision against
consumers.
In
DIRECTV,
Inc v Imburgia,
California residents signed service contracts with DirecTV that
contained a mandatory arbitration provision and a class arbitration
waiver. The policy said that if the “law of your state” makes
class arbitration waivers unenforceable, then the whole arbitration
agreement is unenforceable too.
California,
at the time, was one of those states with laws making class-action
waivers illegal. Specifically, in 2005, the California Supreme Court
decided Discover
Bank v Superior Court,
which
called such agreements “consumer contract[s] of adhesion” and
“unconscionable under California law [that] should not be
enforced.”
In 2008, two consumers sued DirecTV because of illegal early
termination fees. The case dragged on in court for three years.
But
then, in 2011, the Supreme Court of the United States, in AT&T
Mobility LLC v Concepcion,
ruled that the Federal Arbitration Act – a national law that
directs how and when arbitration clauses may be used – invalidated
the Discover Bank
ruling.
DirecTV asked the judge to send its case to mediation, but the judge
refused. DirecTV appealed that decision all the way to the Supreme
Court.
Instead
of supporting consumers against the “take-it-or-leave-it” tactics
of a major corporation, the Supreme Court said Concepcion
applied even to contracts written before it was decided and the “law
of your state” could only include state laws not later invalidated
by the courts.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg's dissent sums up the situation:
“These decisions have predictably resulted in the deprivation of consumers’ rights to seek redress for losses, and, turning the coin, they have insulated powerful economic interests from liability for violations of consumer protection laws. . . .
“Today, the court holds that consumers lack not only protection against unambiguous class arbitration bans in adhesion contracts. They lack even the benefit of the doubt when anomalous terms in such contracts reasonably could be construed to protect their rights.”
The
Supreme Court's decision gives service providers all the cards when
it comes to mandatory arbitration. Together with Concepcion,
this case has essentially said that states are not allowed
to regulate the arbitration provisions of contracts signed by their
citizens.
Companies must
not have the power to unilaterally mandate arbitration provisions,
and in so doing shield themselves from the corrective power of class
action lawsuits. Since the Supreme Court has demonstrated it is
unwilling to protect consumers, it will have to fall to Congress to
amend the Federal Arbitration Act.
Dani K. Liblang is a consumer
protection attorney with The Liblang Law
Firm, P.C., in Birmingham, Michigan. She represents consumers in
product defect and collections cases. If you are being harassed by
debt collectors, contact
The Liblang Law Firm, P.C., today for a
free consultation.
Wednesday, December 16, 2015
Inspectors Find Credit Card Skimmers at Gas Stations Across Michigan
Identity
theft is a real problem for Michigan residents. Hackers and thieves
threaten credit card security online and at the register. But this
year, the Michigan Department of Agriculture has found remarkable
numbers of credit card skimmers at gas station pumps across the
state.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





